128. Peterson’s New Bowl Coating.

Wouldn’t it be fantastic if you bought a new pipe (no matter if it cost $80 or $800) and it smoked really great at the first bowl?

This is just a brief note to document my experience with Peterson’s the new bowl coating. It is also an invitation to hear from other Peterson users who’ve recently purchased and are smoking Petes with this new coating. As of this writing, I’ve only seen it on the 406 Large Prince, the Aran Rusticated and the Rosslare Rusticated lines, but there may be others. You can distinguish it from previous treatments because it’s quite glossy and very slightly tacky to the touch.

I wrote Peterson to ask about it and they responded that they’ve recently begun using what they believe is a coating superior to the previous paint-on vegetable-base product.

To aid in the binding process, the company has for the first time in its history lightly sanded the inside of the chamber, removing the classic set of pin points caused by the chuck marks. Never fear, purists, as these will remain in the high-grade natural finish lines.

I hate breaking in new pipes and always have, which is the only reason I have unsmoked pipes laying around. I hate break-ins for two reasons: first, they’re just plain stressful, since there’s always the danger that I’ll burn out the pipe, even with a bowl coating (I’ve been called “the Human Torch”). Then second, there’s the off-putting taste of the bowl coating, and I’m not actually talking about Peterson’s last bowl coating, which was better than most. Many artisan-factory pipe makers as well as artisan makers all over the world will tell you quite openly they use medical-quality charcoal powder combined with water glass (potassium silicate) and a bit of water. This, they say, makes a good point-of-sale appearance as well as providing insurance for both maker and smoker that it won’t burn out before its broken in.

Well, I don’t mind so much that it looks like gray 220 grit sandpaper, only that it tastes like it.

As I said, water glass and charcoal haven’t ever been used on Peterson chambers, but while the vegetable-based product they used was better, it wasn’t as good as bare wood. Especially if any stain was lurking beneath it, as could sometimes be the case in many Dublin Era pipes, even those that weren’t dip-stained (a practice used on lower and entry-grade lines which ceased around the year 2000).

So, what about the new coating? I don’t know what ingredients Peterson has used, but my first smoke in the Aran Rusticated was the best I’ve had in any new pipe (not just Peterson, but from other factories and artisans), at least apart from the unfinished or virgin chamber of the Rogha System last May.

After the first smoke and “ashing”

Peterson’s new coating doesn’t seem flavorless to me, but mildly sweet. I smoked Gawith FVF first time out, and beyond the normal sweetness of the virginias there was something else, quite pleasant, that kept me smoking the entire bowl. The pipe also seemed to stay cooler than is normal in first smokes for me. And after the smoke, as you can see by the photo above, the coating seemed to curl and carbonize into the ashes, giving the chamber the appearance of at least five or ten bowls’ of smoking and “ashing” (coating the bowl with the ashes of the tobacco just smoked).

The second smoke (seen below) had me thinking I was smoking a seasoned pipe, not one I’d just smoked twice. Usually I’m nervous through the first dozen smokes, smoking it cautiously, letting the bowl cool every 5-10 minutes and then ritually ashing it after smoking.

After the second smoke and ashing

The sweet sensation of the first bowl was gone in the second smoke, but the inside of the bowl, as you can see in the photo above, seemed to have progressed much faster than a water glass coating and without the occasional hints of wood burning that an unfinished chamber brings.

A lot of real and virtual ink has been spilled over bowl coatings pro and con, going back to the earliest days of briar pipes. In fact, in the earliest Peterson ephemera at the turn of the 20th century, they (like other factories) recommended soaking the bowl in water before smoking it the first time!

My pipe-smoking mentor Beth Kanaley at Ted’s Pipe Shoppe in Tulsa used to advocate smearing honey in the bowl—a practice many (including myself) think is great for getting your tongue fried and maybe hastening a burnout, if nothing else. Many Italians prefer unfinished chambers. German and American artisans as well as companies like Briar Works like water glass mixtures. And loads of smokers will go to the trouble of removing the factory coating, which carries with it the danger of damaging the finish of the outside of the pipe, and recoating it with their own secret sauce or just going buck nekkid. Everyone’s got an opinion, and whatever works for you works, as far as I’m concerned.

Like I said, if you or anyone you know has tried a Peterson with the new bowl coating, drop me a line. When I receive enough comments, I’ll post everyone’s experience.

 

 

 

 

 

4.7 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jorgen Jensen
Jorgen Jensen
5 years ago

Good morning. Back in the 80ties when Peterson began to sell well here the Danish agent asked me what I thought about coating as Petersons on our market were not coated and Danes were used to coated pipes. A man would say: ” I got a new pipe” and the other would say ” Is it broken in “!…………. I just smoke and do not care.

Jorgen Jensen
Jorgen Jensen
5 years ago
Reply to  Mark Irwin

Yes Mark, it is my pipes. I found them when I climbed up a ladder to find two unsmoked Deluxe 221 I knew I had to see what stem they had (Lip) so I asked the madam to take a photo and she send them as my email did not work. I will of course climb up again and find some uncoated but I am afraid that the madam is to angry at the moment to take more photos today and she will be away tomorrow and Wednesday . The D shapes, the agent called it POY. As far as… Read more »

E Baggs
E Baggs
5 years ago

I just ordered a Kerry 120. Now I kind of wish I had ordered a new Aran. I’m curious, how did you form a connection with Ted’s in Tulsa?

E Baggs
E Baggs
5 years ago
Reply to  Mark Irwin

Mark, are you breaking in with full bowls or the partial bowl method? My new Kerry 120 came yesterday but does not have the new coating.

Michael
Michael
5 years ago

I just picked up two new Petersons with the new bowl coating and both initial bowls were great with no foul taste! Definitely pleased with this. There is also no stain in either shank, which was surprising, especially with the Kildare sandblasted (a 106). After reading your review of the Aran, I think I might have to get one.

David F
David F
5 years ago

Greetings Mark: I recently acquired an Aran smooth (unmounted) 999 and an Arklow D-9 (wonderful shape and light as a feather). Right out of the sleeve, they both smoke like well-seasoned pipes. I thought it was the tobacco, because I bought a sample from a local shop (which, they insist is their own special blend of black & gold cavendish–maybe it is, maybe it isn’t but I like it) when I was travelling, and smoked that to break-in my new 2019 St Patrick’s Day 305. My experience with the SPD pipe was so pleasantly surprising that I made it a… Read more »

Joe Gibson
Joe Gibson
5 years ago

Good post. When I acquire a new, unsmoked pipe, I usually get one that is uncoated. My most recent Peterson Fermoy came with a coated bowl (I think it did anyway) and it smoked great from the start. Since then I received an Ardor in a long smoke competition and the bowl was uncoated. I loaded it and smoked it all the way to the ash without a problem also. My question is, “How much does the technique of the smoker have to do with the initial break-in?”

Joe Gibson
Joe Gibson
5 years ago
Reply to  Mark Irwin

The only complaint about the Fermoy is the drilling being too high so it doesn’t pass a pipe cleaner. I’m guessing that is by design though.

Al J
Al J
5 years ago

Very interesting. Peterson must have been reading recent posts on the PipesMagazine forum on the subject. I shared this update to the forum.

r
r
5 years ago

This is great to hear! When was the new coating introduced? (I finally found a deluxe b42, which I assume is recent given how rare they are, and it’s in the mail).

Any thoughts on improving the varnish? I have a couple of sad bubbly examples from 2016-2018 if interested.

Jorgen Jensen
Jorgen Jensen
5 years ago
Reply to  r

Congrats on your B42 De Luxe. I have been looking after one, but there is no one around here. The six De luxe I got from England in Dec, Jan & April are without coating.
I got a Tyrone 106 smooth years back with much varnish. It bubbled a little at the first smokes but it look fine now. The agent said he would tell them in Dublin – but I only take it as an experience. The pipe smokes fine.

r
r
5 years ago
Reply to  Jorgen Jensen

Oh yeah, the pipes work great. I agree, the varnish bubbling (rim only) was just a “huh?” moment.

r
r
5 years ago

Ah, then I won’t have anything to say about this for a while 🙂

The bubbly varnish showed up after the first smoke, sadly. I’ll check out the blogs, thanks for the pointers!

Asyraf Pauzi
4 years ago

He hey…no wonder….
I just breaking in my newly bought Donegal Rocky…

It smoke great,but I bit worried bout the coating. At first I think it’s poorly applied because it’s feel lil sticky to touch. Then when I’m smoking it’s seems crooked .

But the smoke is great and I agree.it taste sweeter.

Kim
Kim
4 years ago

Hi i have just received my peterson 305 and off course had to try it immediately had to try it, it has the new coating. I am very pleased with the first bowl, no bad taste to the coating or any burning wood taste. As you said it does taste like a seasond pipe i had to let it go out a few times due to the bowl getting hot but every time it was re lit it tasted good, thank you for starting this debate it was good to read before lighting the new pipe

Kim
Kim
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark Irwin

Glad i could enter something useful, unfortunately im a bad pipe smoker roughly a bowl an hour and treat it like a cigarette by inhaling, i dont smoke cigarettes and i really like the taste of most pipe tobaccos, my weakness is cherry, anyway ive got to die of something may as well enjoy life. Also thank you for your reply

Robert Land
3 years ago

This is my first experience with a coated bowl. I purchased a Peterson Walnut Spigot. The initial smoke was the most enjoyable “first smoke” I have experienced in any new pipe. This experience will cause me to consider purchasing more Petersons than other brands.

Fred
Fred
3 years ago

New peterson system delux the black inside coating of the wall went out after first smoke cleaning

Fred
Fred
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark Irwin

They don’t want to take it back. Said that the fact that the paper towel was a bit wet (with water) when cleaning removed the coating

Charles Funn
Charles Funn
1 year ago

I just bought a Christmas 2022 Copper Spigot Heritage (05) Heritage yesterday. The coating seemed to be charcoal based. Before my virgin smokes I coat the bowl with Uncle Nearest Bourbon on my finger or a pipe cleaner. The first smoke was smooth with no problem. I’m breaking it in with my last tins of John Cotton #1. I only had problems breaking in my Irish Second Tanshells with the uncoated bowls. Bought a Christmas Copper Heritage earlier (124) for my Virginias, Orlick Golden and Rattrays Marlin Flake. No problems, smooth break in. It did get hot with the thin… Read more »